AI for payment risk

The MID freezes.
Then what?

I map each dispute to the exact evidence package it needs and show MID-level exposure before the blended spreadsheet hides the problem.

No login
No IT
No pilot
MID healthevidence map
AT RISK
reason-code path
flagged: one product line contaminating the MID ratio
pain

Frozen MID

The acquirer freezes the MID without warning.

pain

Threshold pressure

The risk ratio is approaching the line, and chargebacks need suppression fast.

pain

Evidence drag

Compiling compelling evidence takes the team too long per dispute.

pain

Blended reporting

One product line can take down the whole MID while the spreadsheet averages it away.

What I build

Reason codes to evidence, line by line.

Your payments lead still owns risk and compliance decisions. My system does the mapping: reason code, transaction history, product terms, prior activity, return policy, fulfillment proof, and the missing evidence before the response window closes.

01

Load the disputes

I ingest the dispute export, transaction data, product data, and policy documents you already use.

02

Map the reason code

Each dispute gets tied to its evidentiary requirement instead of a generic template.

03

Assemble the package

The system pulls the required proof and marks what is missing before submission.

04

Separate the MIDs

Exposure gets shown by MID and product line so one risk pocket does not disappear inside an average.

Evidence sharp tip

The representment package gets built from the reason code.

CE 3.0 path
Read the reason code.
Match the required evidence.
Assemble the response package for human review.

Secondary pass: MID-level exposure monitoring so the riskiest product line is visible before it contaminates the whole account.

Receipts

Exact standards. Exact evidence.

extraction mode
Exact

Deterministic extraction - not a chatbot, not OCR guessing.

validated benchmark
100%

100% statute recall on a validated benchmark.

The same precision that pulls exact clauses from legal filings maps exact evidentiary standards to exact dispute reason codes.

The Diagnostic

How much revenue did you lose last month to disputes you couldn't build evidence for in time?

Fixed-scope Diagnostic. In 14 days I map the dispute workflow, reason-code paths, evidence sources, and where MID-level monitoring should become a fixed system.

I do not promise approvals, prevent MID termination, give financial advice, or touch funds. A human still reviews the risk decision. My system flags and extracts so the human is faster and misses less.

Start with the Diagnostic.

$950, fixed. Send what you already have — the messy spreadsheets are the data — and get back the one gap producing your thirty symptoms. 2–4 business days. Credited toward the first build if we continue. Yours either way.